[kitten] call for reviews of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[kitten] call for reviews of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator

Benjamin Kaduk-2
This document is being implemented and is likely ready to advance to the
IESG, but as Nathaniel noted at the end of June, it's only had Greg's
review of the -02, my review of the precursor draft, and whatever review
Tom did when the authdata number was assigned.  It would be good to get a
couple more reviews before we send this document over to the IESG, even if
we are going to try out the new scheme that skips a formal WGLC.

-Ben
for the kitten chairs

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [kitten] call for reviews of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator

Richard Feezel
I am keenly interested in seeing this approved as I have immediate need of this capability.

I have carefully read the -02 draft and I find no problems with it moving forward as written.

Thanks,
Richard

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <[hidden email]> wrote:
This document is being implemented and is likely ready to advance to the
IESG, but as Nathaniel noted at the end of June, it's only had Greg's
review of the -02, my review of the precursor draft, and whatever review
Tom did when the authdata number was assigned.  It would be good to get a
couple more reviews before we send this document over to the IESG, even if
we are going to try out the new scheme that skips a formal WGLC.

-Ben
for the kitten chairs

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten



--
Richard M Feezel
[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten