[kitten] RFC5896 incorrectly listed as updating only RFC4120 -- also updates RFCs 2743, 2744, and 4121

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[kitten] RFC5896 incorrectly listed as updating only RFC4120 -- also updates RFCs 2743, 2744, and 4121

Nico Williams
How to fix this?

Nico
--

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [kitten] RFC5896 incorrectly listed as updating only RFC4120 -- also updates RFCs 2743, 2744, and 4121

Robbie Harwood
Nico Williams <[hidden email]> writes:

> How to fix this?

Would this be covered under errata?
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php#reportnew

Thanks,
--Robbie

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

signature.asc (847 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [kitten] RFC5896 incorrectly listed as updating only RFC4120 -- also updates RFCs 2743, 2744, and 4121

Shawn Emery

That would be my inclination, given that it does not affect implementation or deployment.  Erratum could be made and then placed in a Hold for Document Update state. 

Shawn.
--

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:18 PM Robbie Harwood <[hidden email]> wrote:
Nico Williams <[hidden email]> writes:

> How to fix this?

Would this be covered under errata?
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php#reportnew

Thanks,
--Robbie
_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten